NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Lalic v Lalic [2022] NSWSC 31 Hearing dates: 24 and 25 June 2021 Date of orders: 27 January 2022 Decision date: 27 January 2022 Jurisdiction: Equity - Family Provision List Before: Henry J Decision: The plaintiff is entitled to provision of a lump sum of $125,000 in lieu of the provision made for the plaintiff under the deceased's will dated 1 May 2008. Catchwords: SUCCESSION – Family Provision – Claim by adult child – where deceased's estate principally comprised of real property devised to other adult children and plaintiff left with a share of residue – where plaintiff received gift of land from parents during their lifetime, undertook many years of unpaid work for family business and had close relationship with deceased – where plaintiff is a disability pensioner and unable to work – where other adult children have competing claims based on financial position and contributions to deceased's welfare – further provision ordered Legislation Cited: Succession Act 2006 (NSW), ss 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 72 Cases Cited: Bates v Cooke [2015] NSWCA 278 Blendell v Blendell [2020] NSWCA 154 Blendell v Byrne; Estate of Blendell [2019] NSWSC 583 Chan v Chan [2016] NSWCA 222 Chapple v Wilcox (2014) 87 NSWLR 646; [2014] NSWCA 392 Grant v Roberts; Smith v Smith; Roberts v Smith; Curtis v Smith [2019] NSWSC 843 Limberger v Limberger; Oakman v Limberger [2021] NSWSC 474 Megerditchian v Khatchadourian [2020] NSWCA 229 Megerditchian v Khatchadourian [2019] NSWSC 1870 Meres v Meres [2017] NSWSC 285 Sgro v Thompson [2017] NSWCA 326 Slack v Rogan; Palffy v Rogan (2013) 85 NSWLR 253; [2013] NSWSC 522 Squire v Squire [2019] NSWCA 90 Steinmetz v Shannon (2019) 99 NSWLR 687; [2019] NSWCA 114 Taylor v Farrugia [2009] NSWSC 801 Tobin v Ezekiel (2012) 83 NSWLR 757; [2012] NSWCA 285 Underwood v Gaudron [2015] NSWCA 269 Vigolo v Bostin (2005) 221 CLR 191; [2005] HCA 11 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Anthony Lalic (Plaintiff) Anne Lalic (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: K Morrissey (Plaintiff) R W Tregenza (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate