NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Lupton (No 1) [2022] NSWSC 33 Hearing dates: 19, 20 January 2022 Date of orders: 20 January 2022 Decision date: 20 January 2022 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Hamill J Decision: (1) The tendency evidence is not admissible. (2) The text messages are admissible with the exception of items 87 to 90, 186 and all or part of 188. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – evidence – tendency evidence – murder by stabbing – where accused arrested with knife the night before alleged murder – accused arrested with small blade at the time of his arrest after the murder – alleged tendency to possess knives – where issue in trial expected to be self defence and whether accused brought knife to the scene – whether evidence possesses significant probative value – whether unfair prejudice exceeds probative value CRIMINAL LAW – evidence – text messages – whether evidence relevant to the accused's state of mind – whether direction capable of curing any potential misuse of the evidence Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) s 97(1)(a) Cases Cited: Elomar v R [2014] NSWCCA 303 Hughes v The Queen (2017) 263 CLR 338; [2017] HCA 20 IMM v R (2016) 257 CLR 300; [2016] HCA 14 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Regina Jay Lupton Representation: Counsel: G Harrison (Regina) A Webb (Lupton)
Solicitors: Solicitor for the NSW DPP (Regina) Legal Aid (Lupton) File Number(s): 2020/00073934
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate