NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: CLT v Secretary, Department of Education [2022] NSWCATAD 34 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 31 January 2022 Decision date: 31 January 2022 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: P French, Senior Member Decision: (1) Pursuant to section 50(2) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013, a hearing of the application is dispensed with. (2) The agency's decision that it does not hold any further information responsive to the applicant's access request is affirmed. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – administrative review of a reviewable decision – decision that information is not held by the agency Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 Government Sector Employment Act 2013 Cases Cited: CLT v Department of Education [2021] NSWCATAD 249 Klaric v Commissioner of Police [2020] NSWCATAP 153 Wojciechowska v Commissioner of Police [2020] NSWCATAP 173 Category: Principal judgment Parties: CLT, applicant Secretary, Department of Education Representation: CLT, self-represented Jenni Pendergast, Regional Manager, Right to Access, for respondent File Number(s): 2020/00112820 Publication restriction: Pursuant to s 64(1)(a) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013: (i) The applicant is to continue to be identified by the pseudonym "CLT"; and (ii) The identity of the applicant is not to be disclosed by the agency or any other person.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate