NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Hanna v R [2022] NSWCCA 7 Hearing dates: 29 September 2021 Date of orders: 4 February 2022 Decision date: 04 February 2022 Before: Johnson J at [1]; Fullerton J at [88]; Dhanji J at [89]. Decision: Application for an extension of time within which to seek leave to appeal against conviction refused. Catchwords: CRIME – application for extension of time to bring appeal against conviction – offence of indecent assault under s.61L Crimes Act 1900 – claim of miscarriage of justice arising from conduct of defence counsel at trial – advice as to whether accused should give evidence at trial – accused did not give evidence – complaint concerning cross-examination of complainant – held accused made informed decision not to give evidence at trial – trial conducted in accordance with instructions of accused – miscarriage of justice not demonstrated – extension of time refused Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Cases Cited: Craig v The Queen (2018) 264 CLR 202; [2018] HCA 13 Kentwell v The Queen (2014) 252 CLR 601; [2014] HCA 37 Roach v R (2019) 344 FLR 429; [2019] NSWCCA 160 TKWJ v The Queen (2002) 212 CLR 124; [2002] HCA 46 Tsiakas v R [2015] NSWCCA 187 Texts Cited: --- Category: Principal judgment Parties: Joseph Hanna (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr A Norrie (Applicant) Ms C Curtis (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate