NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Hailes v Commissioner of Police [2022] NSWCATAD 37 Hearing dates: 21 January 2022 Date of orders: 2 February 2022 Decision date: 02 February 2022 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: Emeritus Prof GD Walker, Senior Member Decision: (1) Decision under review set aside. (2) A category AB firearms licence is to be issued to the applicant. Catchwords: LICENSING – firearms licence refusal – fit and proper person – public interest – prior record. Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 (NSW) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Firearms Act 1996 (NSW) Cases Cited: Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond [1990] HCA 35, (1990) 170 CLR 321; Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 316; Bronze Wing International Pty Ltd v SafeWork New South Wales [2017] NSWCA 42; Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force v EMB [2021] NSWCATAP 63; Constantin v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2013] NSWADTAP 16; Cusumano v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Service [2001] NSWADT 50; Director-General Transport New South Wales v AIC (GD) NSWADT [2011] NSWADT AP 6; DMC v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2017] NSWCATAD 219; Esterman v Commissioner of police, New South Wales Police Force [2014] NSWCATOD 70; Hook v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2020] NSWCATAD 250; Hughes and Vale Pty Ltd v New South Wales (No. 2) (1955) 93 CLR 127; Joseph v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2017] NSWCA 31; Kavalieratos v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2014] NSWCATAD 117; Keegan Jaques v Commissioner of Police [2017] NSWCATAD 145; Kocic v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2014] NSWCA 368; Martin v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2017] NSWCATAD 97; McDonald v Director-General, Social Services (1984) FCA 57, (1984) 1 FCR 354; Moefili v State Parole Authority [2009] NSWSC 1146; Nakad v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2014] NSWCATAP 1; Petas v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2013] NSWADT 137; Smith v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2014] NSWCATAD 184; Stealth Enterprises Pty Ltd v Calliden Insurance Ltd 2015] NSWSC 1270; Sterjovski v Director-General, Department of Transport [2002] NSWADT 10; Webb v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Service [2004] NSWADT 110. Category: Principal judgment Parties: Nathan J Hailes (Applicant) Commissioner of Police (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Hartmann & Associates (Applicant) Makinson D'Apice (Respondent) File Number(s): 2021/00270695
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate