Fasako Pty Ltd v TianyD Beauty & Hairdressing Australia Pty Ltd [2022] NSWSC 49

Supreme Court New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Fasako Pty Ltd v TianyD Beauty & Hairdressing Australia Pty Ltd [2022] NSWSC 49 Hearing dates: 7-8 April 2021 Date of orders: 3 February 2022 Decision date: 03 February 2022 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Harrison AsJ Decision: The Court orders: (1) Leave to appeal is refused (2) The summons filed 2 October 2020 is dismissed. (3) The plaintiff is to pay the defendant's costs. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Judicial Review – Leave to Appeal – Mis-exercise of discretion – Error of law in construction of lease – No evidence – Leave to appeal refused Legislation Cited: Building Act 1972 (ACT) Building Act 2004 (ACT) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), s 83 Home Building Act 1989 (NSW) Retail Leases Act 1994 (NSW), s 34 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 69 Cases Cited: Advance Fitness Corp Pty Limited v Bondi Diggers Memorial and Sporting Club Ltd [1999] NSWSC 264 Alamdo Holdings Pty Ltd v Australian Window Furnishings (NSW) Pty Ltd [2004] NSWSC 487 Alamdo Holdings Pty Ltd v Australian Window Furnishings (NSW) Pty Ltd [2006] NSWCA 224 Be Financial Pty Ltd as Trustee for Be Financial Operations Trust v Das [2012] NSWCA 164 Carbure Pty Ltd v Brile Pty Ltd [2002] VSC 272 Chappell v Gregory (1864) 55 ER 361 Cooper v Westpac General Insurance Ltd [2007] ACTCA 20 Coulter v R [1988] HCA 3; 164 CLR 350 Coulton v Holcombe (1986) 162 CLR 1 Di Francesco & Ors v Blantric Pty Ltd [2004] NSWLEC 669 Electricity Generation Corporation v Woodside Energy Ltd (2014) 251 CLR 640 George Fischer v Multi Design [1998] 61 Con LR 85 Holus Bolus Pty Ltd v The Wicko Pty Ltd [2012] NSWSC 497 J F Hillam Pty Ltd v Mooney (1988) 48 SASR 381 Kallinosis v Woollahra Municipal Council [2017] NSWLEC 1673 Koompahtoo Local Aboriginal Land Council v Sanpine Pty Ltd (2007) 233 CLR 115 Koundouris v Owners - Units Plan No 1917 (2017) 323 FLR 375 Lee v New South Wales Crime Commission (2012) 224 A Crim R 94; [2012] NSWCA 262 Lurcott v Wakely and Wheeler [1911] 1 KB 905 Musa v Alzreaiawi [2021] NSWCA 12 Park v Brothers [2005] HCA 73 Shepherd v Felt and Textiles Australia Ltd (1931) 45 CLR 359 Suttor v Gundowa Pty Ltd (1950) 81 CLR 418 TAL Life Ltd v Shuetrim (2016) 91 NSWLR 429 University of Wollongong v Metwally (No 2) (1958) 158 CLR 447 Water Board v Moustakas (1988) 180 CLR 491 Western Electric Ltd v Walsh Development Agency [1983] QB 796 Whisprun v Dixon (2003) 200 ALR 447 Texts Cited: Macquarie Dictionary, online ed Category: Principal judgment Parties: Fasako Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) TianyD Beauty & Hairdressing Australia Pty Ltd (First Defendant) Yao Zhu (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: G Sirtes SC with A Avery-Williams (Plaintiff) A Leopold SC with T Fishburn (First & Second Defendants) Solicitors: Hunt & Hunt Lawyers (Plaintiff) TPS&Co Lawyers (First & Second Defendants) File Number(s): 2020/285379 Publication restriction: Nil