NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Makowska v St George Community Housing Ltd [2022] NSWCA 5 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 7 February 2022 Decision date: 07 February 2022 Before: Meagher JA at [1]; Payne JA at [1]; N Adams J at [1] Decision: (1) Summons dated 27 July 2021 is dismissed with costs. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW — judicial review — requirement to demonstrate jurisdictional error or error of law on the face of the record — no error demonstrated ADMINISTRATIVE LAW — remedies — discretionary factors — where statutory right of appeal not availed of — absence of satisfactory explanation — avoidance of need to obtain leave to appeal — whether relief should be refused on discretionary grounds LEASES AND TENANCIES — concurrent lease — relationship between concurrent lessee and tenant under current lease — assumption of obligations to tenant by concurrent lessee Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), ss 34, 78, 81, 83 Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), s 12 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 131 Housing Act 2001 (NSW), s 13A Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), s 78B Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (NSW), ss 3, 13, 50, 52, 187 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), ss 48, 51, 69 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Regulation 2013 (NSW), r 9(1)(b) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 50.3, 59.10 Cases Cited: Brandy v Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (1995) 183 CLR 245; [1995] HCA 10 Gazecki v McCabes Lawyers Pty Ltd (2020) 102 NSWLR 259; [2020] NSWCA 98 Makowska v St George Community Housing Ltd [2021] NSWCATAP 198 Probuild Constructions (Aust) Pty Ltd v Shade Systems Pty Ltd (2018) 264 CLR 1; [2018] HCA 4 Quinn v Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions [2021] NSWCA 294 Texts Cited: Andrew G Lang, Leases and Tenancies in New South Wales (1976, The Law Book Co) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Zofia Makowska (Applicant) St George Community Housing Ltd (First Respondent) New South Wales Civil and Administrative Tribunal (Second Respondent) (submitting appearance) Representation: Counsel: Litigant in person (Applicant) AR Langshaw (First Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate