NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Snowy Mountains Grammar School Ltd v Adventurer AWD Pty Ltd [2022] NSWSC 53 Hearing dates: On the papers: last submission 31 January 2022. Date of orders: 4 February 2022 Decision date: 04 February 2022 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Rees J Decision: Indemnity costs following non-acceptance of Offer of Compromise. Catchwords: COSTS — relevance of reasonableness in rejection of offers of compromise – presumption in favour of indemnity costs not displaced – indemnity costs ordered. Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Amaca Pty Ltd v Werfel (No 2) [2021] SASCFC 26 Bostik Australia Pty Ltd v Liddiard (No 2) [2009] NSWCA 304 Cross v Queensland Newspapers Pty Ltd (No 2) [2008] NSWCA 120 Futuretronics.com.au Pty Ltd v Graphix Labels Pty Ltd [2009] FCAFC 40 IFTC Broking Services Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (2010) 268 ALR 1 IFTC Broking Services Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (2010) 268 ALR 1; [2010] FCAFC 31 Jainti Pty Limited v Fraser Panorama Pty Limited (2) [2021] NSWSC 965 James v Surf Road Nominees Pty Ltd (No 2) [2005] NSWCA 296 Latoudis v Casey (1990) 170 CLR 534 Leach v The Nominal Defendant (QBE Insurance (Australia) Ltd) (No 2) [2014] NSWCA 391 Morgan v Johnson (1998) 44 NSWLR 478 New South Wales Insurance Ministerial Corp v Reeve (1993) 42 NSWLR 100 Port Kembla Coal Terminal Ltd v Braverus Maritime Inc (No 2) (2004) 212 ALR 281; [2004] FCA 1437 Queensland North Australia Pty Ltd v Takeovers Panel (No 2) (2015) 236 FCR 370; [2015] FCAFC 128 Ritter v Godfrey [1920] 2 KB 47 Roads and Traffic Authority (NSW) v McGregor (No 2) [2005] NSWCA 453 Snowy Mountains Grammar School Ltd v Adventurer AWD Pty Ltd [2021] NSWSC 1602 South Eastern Sydney Area Health Service v King [2006] NSWCA 2 Sydney Ferries v Morton (No 2) [2010] NSWCA 238 Tarabay v Leite [2008] NSWCA 259 Vale v Eggins (No 2) [2007] NSWCA 12 Category: Costs Parties: Snowy Mountains Grammar School Ltd (Plaintiff) Adventurer AWD Pty Ltd (First Defendant) Neil Bamford (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr S O'Donnell (Solicitor) (Plaintiff) Mr M Zammit (Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate