NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Quach v Horvath (No 2) [2022] NSWSC 55 Hearing dates: 6 October 2021 Date of orders: 4 February 2022 Decision date: 04 February 2022 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Harrison AsJ Decision: The Court orders: (1) The plaintiff is to pay the defendant's costs of the proceedings. (2) The plaintiff is to pay the defendant the lump sum costs of $11,153.20. Catchwords: COSTS – Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) – Ordinary basis – Gross sum costs – Desirable to avoid expense/delay/aggravation/futility of costs assessment – No evidence of financial position Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 98 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) Health Care Complaints Act 1993 (NSW) Insurance Contract Act 1984 (Cth) Medical Practices Act 1992 (NSW) s 13 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) rr 42.1, 42.20(1) and 42.26 Cases Cited: Bechara v Bates (No 4) [2015] NSWSC 1722 Fan v South Eastern Sydney Local Health District (No 3) [2015] NSWSC 1620 Harrison v Schipp (2002) 54 NSWLR 738 Quach v Horvarth [2021] NSWSC 1401 Re JJT; Ex parte Victoria Legal Aid [1998] HCA 44 Sedgwick v Varzonek (No. 2) [2015] NSWSC 1613 Smoothpool v Pickering [2001] SASC 131 Wentworth v Wentworth [1996] NSWCA 552; BC9600215 Category: Costs Parties: Dr Michael Quach (Plaintiff) Professor John Horvath (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: D. Hume (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate