NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Lewis v Doyle [2022] NSWSC 92 Hearing dates: 18-22 October 2021 Date of orders: 18 February 2022 Decision date: 18 February 2022 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Davies J Decision: Judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $1,353,850.00 Catchwords: TORTS – trespass to the person – assault – sexual assault – where Plaintiff aged between 14 and 15 sexually assaulted on number of occasions by employer in 1980s – plaintiff seeking compensatory and aggravated damages – psychiatric and psychological harm to plaintiff – substance addiction – causation – whether other factors contributed to plaintiff's injuries – where sexual assaults caused lifelong injury to plaintiff principally from wrongdoing of defendant TORTS – trespass to the person – assault – sexual assault – where defendant has been convicted of criminal offences against the plaintiff – use to be made of previous convictions – s 91 Evidence Act Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) s 3B Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) ss 91, 178 Cases Cited: Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336 Josifouski v Velovski [2013] NSWSC 1103 Malec v Hutton (1990) 169 CLR 638 Miles v Doyle (No 2) [2021] NSWSC 1312 Neat Holdings Pty Ltd v Karajan Holdings Pty Ltd (1992) 67 ALJR 170; 110 ALR 449; [1992] HCA 66 New South Wales v Ibbett (2006) 229 CLR 638; [2006] HCA 57 Purkess v Crittenden (1965) 114 CLR 164 Uren v John Fairfax & Sons Pty Ltd (1966) 117 CLR 118 Watts v Rake (1960) 108 CLR 158 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Darren John Lewis (Plaintiff) Philip William Doyle (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: K Andrews & R Brown (Plaintiff) T Hall (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate