NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Dymocks Franchise Systems (NSW) Pty Ltd v Chapter Three Pty Ltd [2022] NSWSC 35 Hearing dates: On the papers; submissions received 7 and 24 December 2021 and 4 February 2022 Decision date: 10 February 2022 Jurisdiction: Equity - Commercial List Before: Stevenson J Decision: Order that the defendants pay the plaintiff's costs of these proceedings: (1) as to the first and second defendants, on an indemnity basis; and (2) as to the third defendant, on the ordinary basis. Catchwords: COSTS – court's discretion as to costs – rule as to costs where merits of proceeding not heard – where contractual entitlement to indemnity costs – where proceedings precipitated by unreasonable conduct of defendants – where plaintiff in substance succeeded – entitlement to indemnity costs Cases Cited: Gomba Holdings (UK) Ltd v Minories Finance Limited (No 2) [1993] Ch 171 Kyabram Property Investments Pty Ltd v Murray [2005] NSWCA 87 One.Tel Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2000] FCA 270 Re Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs; Ex parte Lai Qin (1997) 186 CLR 622; [1997] HCA 6 Category: Costs Parties: Dymocks Franchise Systems (NSW) Pty Limited (Plaintiff) Chapter Three Pty Limited (First Defendant) Meenakshi Kapuria (Second Defendant) Prosper Global Pty Ltd (Third Defendant) Representation: Counsel: J A C Potts SC with A R Langshaw (Plaintiff) A Cheshire SC (Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate