NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Re Tuck; Estate of the Late Wilfred Richard Tuck [2022] NSWSC 107 Hearing dates: 4 February 2022 Date of orders: 4 February 2022 Decision date: 04 February 2022 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Slattery J Decision: Judicial advice given. The will of the testator sufficiently identifies all the named charities that are gifted portions of the residue of the estate. Catchwords: EQUITY – Trusts and trustees – Judicial advice – advice pursuant to Trustee Act 1925 s 63 – Charitable Trusts Act 1993, s 10(2) where the testator demonstrates a general charitable intention – where doubt exists about the identification of two of the charities named as residuary beneficiaries – where a testator's charitable intention can also be inferred from other charitable gifts in the will and from the deceased's medical history – whether the gifts in relation to the doubtfully identified charities fail. Legislation Cited: Charitable Trusts Act 1993, s 10(2) Charities Act 2013 (Cth) Trustee Act 1925 (NSW), 63 Trustee Act 1925, s 63 Cases Cited: Attorney General (NSW) v Perpetual Trustee Co Ltd (1940) 63 CLR 209 Hood as Executor of the Estate of Inez Irene Barbetti (Dec) v The Attorney General for Western Australia & Anor [2006] WASC 157 (Hasluck J) In the Estate of Dulcie Edna Rand (dec'd) [2009] NSWSC 48 Re Daniels (deceased) [1970] VR 72 Texts Cited: Young Croft Smith, On Equity, Law Book Co 2009 [6.490] Category: Consequential orders Parties: Plaintiff/Executor: Robert Neil Tuck; Estate of the late Wilfred Richard Tuck Representation: Counsel: Plaintiff/Executor: A.M. Gruzman
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate