NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Salakis v Silvabuilt Pty Ltd; Silvabuilt Pty Ltd v Salakis [2022] NSWCATAP 40 Hearing dates: 19 April and 29 July 2021 Date of orders: 15 February 2022 Decision date: 15 February 2022 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: The Hon F Marks, Principal Member D Robertson, Senior Member Decision: (1) Leave to appeal refused. (2) Appeal dismissed. (3) Within 14 days of the date of publication of this Decision either party may file submissions or further submissions concerning appeal 2021/00056103 or seeking an order in relation to the costs of appeal 2020/00371175. (4) If a party files submissions pursuant to Order 3 the other party may within a further 14 days file submissions in response. (5) Any party seeking an oral hearing either in relation to appeal 2021/0056103 or in relation to the costs of appeal 2020/00371175 shall include in submissions filed in accordance with orders 3 and/or 4 an outline of why they submit that such a hearing is necessary. Catchwords: BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION – Contract – Termination – Repudiation – Whether dispute resolution clause excluded possibility of acceptance of repudiation if requirements not complied with BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION – Contract – Damages – Damages for loss of profits assessed by reference to contractual clause governing payment in the event of reduction in the scope of work – Whether party seeking damages had led sufficient evidence to establish loss of profits - Whether such evidence is necessary where damages are assessed on the basis of a contractual clause Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules 2014 (NSW) Home Building Act 1989 (NSW) Cases Cited: Collins v Urban [2014] NSWCATAP 17 Commonwealth v Amann Aviation Pty Ltd (1991) 174 CLR 64; [1991] HCA 54 Dimitropoulos v Capital Constructions Pty Ltd; Capital Constructions Pty Ltd v Dimitropoulos [2018] NSWCATAP 100 DTR Nominees Pty Ltd v Mona Homes Pty Ltd (1978) 138 CLR 423 H Build Pty Ltd v Nixon [2018] NSWCATCD 20 M & M Building Pty Ltd v Keith [2017] NSWCATAP 88 Mann v Paterson Constructions Pty Ltd [2019] HCA 32; 267 CLR 560 New South Wales Land and Housing Corporation v Orr [2019] NSWCA 231 Prendergast v Western Murray Irrigation Ltd [2014] NSWCATAP 69 Robinson v Harman (1848) 1 Exch 850; 154 ER 363 Ryder v Frohlich [2004] NSWCA 472 TCN Channel 9 Pty Ltd v Hayden Enterprises Pty Ltd (1989) 16 NSWLR 130 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Bill Patselis and Vicky Salakis (Appellants in 2020/00371175, Respondents in 2021/00056103)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate