NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Roiss v R [2022] NSWCCA 25 Hearing dates: 18 June 2021 Decision date: 17 February 2022 Before: McCallum JA at [1]; Rothman J at [47]; Wright J at [48]; Decision: (1) Grant leave to appeal. (2) Dismiss the appeal. Catchwords: SENTENCING — Appeal against sentence — Severity — Whether sentence manifestly excessive due to personal hardship — Whether assistance provided to police warranted reduction of sentence — Whether special circumstances to reduce non-parole period due to drug addiction Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 23, 44(2) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 193B(2) Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW), ss 10, 25 Cases Cited: Browning v R [2015] NSWCCA 147 Howard v R [2019] NSWCCA 109 Le v R [2019] NSWCCA 181 R v Ellis (1986) 6 NSWLR 603 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Sebastian Roiss (Applicant) Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: S Howell (Applicant) E Wilkins SC (Respondent)
Solicitors: Legal Aid (Applicant) Director of Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2019/233062 Publication restriction: None Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: New South Wales District Court Jurisdiction: Criminal Date of Decision: 26 June 2020 Before: King SC DCJ File Number(s): 2019/233062
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate