NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Aquamore Credit Equity Pty Ltd v Hung; First on First Development Pty Ltd v Aquamore Credit Equity Pty Ltd (No 2) [2022] NSWSC 117 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 17 February 2022 Decision date: 17 February 2022 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Meagher JA Decision: In proceeding 2019/371915: (1) Judgment for the plaintiff against the first defendant and the second defendant in the amount of $10,175,367, that judgment to take effect as of 21 December 2021. In proceeding 2020/341930: (2) The Court declares that the stipulation in clause 7.1 of the Facility Agreement between Aquamore Credit Equity Pty Ltd and First on First Development Pty Ltd dated 7 December 2016 providing for the payment of interest at the Higher Rate is unenforceable as a penalty. (3) Otherwise dismiss the claims for relief made by the summons filed 2 December 2020. In proceedings 2019/371915 and 2020/341930: (4) Order that First on First Development Pty Ltd and Mr Edgar Hung and Mr Trevor Chappell pay 70% of the costs of Aquamore Credit Equity Pty Ltd and Mr Allen Hsu and Mr Zachary Chang of both proceedings assessed on the ordinary basis. Catchwords: COSTS – offer of compromise – whether period for acceptance reasonable in circumstances JUDGMENTS AND ORDERS – interest – pre-judgment interest – rate applicable JUDGMENTS AND ORDERS – interest – post-judgment interest – exercise of discretion in Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) s 101 Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 20.26, 36.4(3), 36.7 Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 100, 101 Category: Costs Parties: Aquamore Credit Equity Pty Ltd (Plaintiff, 2019/371915; First defendant, 2020/341930) Edgar Hung (First defendant, 2019/371915) Trevor Chappell (Second defendant, 2019/371915) First on First Development Pty Ltd (Plaintiff, 2020/341930) Allen Hsu (Second defendant, 2020/341930) Zachary Chang (Third defendant, 2020/341930) Representation: Counsel: B Le Plastrier and R Sud (Plaintiff, 2019/371915; Defendants, 2020/341930) F Corsaro SC (Defendants, 2019/371915; Plaintiff, 2020/341930)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate