NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Anda v R [2022] NSWCCA 29 Hearing dates: 9 July 2021 Decision date: 17 February 2022 Before: McCallum JA at [1]; Rothman J at [65]; Ierace J at [66]. Decision: 1. To the extent required, grant leave to appeal. 2. Dismiss the appeal. Catchwords: CRIME — Appeals — Appeal against conviction —whether acquittal of co-accused was inconsistent with conviction of applicant for the same charge — whether the offence tried was the offence charged on the indictment Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 10(5) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 59(2), 86(2), 86(3) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 6(1) Cases Cited: Mackay v R (1977) 136 CLR 465; [1977] HCA 22 Mackenzie v R (1996) 190 CLR 348; [1996] HCA 35 R v Brougham (1986) SASR 187 R v Button; R v Griffen (2002) 54 NSWLR 455; [2002] NSWCCA 159 Texts Cited: NSW Criminal Trial Courts Bench Book NSW Law Reform Commission, Complicity (Report No 129), (Dec 2010) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Abraham Anda (Applicant) Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: J Clarke (Applicant) G Wright (Respondent)
Solicitors: Zhai & Associates (Applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (NSW) (Respondent) File Number(s): 2018/285062 Publication restriction: None Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court of New South Wales Jurisdiction: Criminal Date of Decision: 20 December 2019 Before: Hoy SC DCJ File Number(s): 2018/285062
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate