NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Rosemary Corbett v Anita Hyde [2022] NSWLEC 13 Hearing dates: 16 February 2022 Date of orders: 16 February 2022 Decision date: 21 February 2022 Jurisdiction: Class 4 Before: Pepper J Decision: Leave granted to the applicant to amend the summons and points of claim. Costs reserved. Catchwords: PROCEDURE: application to amend summons and pleading – applicable legal principles – whether prejudice to respondents if leave granted – whether adequate, or any, explanation for the delay in making the amendment – whether amendment merely seeking to regularise the pleadings in conformity with pre-existing knowledge of parties – leave granted – costs reserved. Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005, ss 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 64 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, s 9.46 Cases Cited: Ah Sam v Mortimer [2021] NSWCA 327 Australia Limited v Australian National University (2009) 239 CLR 175; [2009] HCA 27 Browne v Dunn (1893) 6 R 67 Expense Reduction Analysts Group Pty Ltd v Armstrong Strategic Management and Marketing Pty Limited (2013) 250 CLR 303; [2013] HCA 46 Johnson v Mackinnon [2021] NSWCA 152 Payne v Mosman Municipal Council [2000] NSWLEC 25 Redland Bricks Ltd v Morris [1970] AC 652 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Rosemary Corbett (Applicant) Anita Ellen Hyde (First Respondent) Shay Patrick Hicks (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: A Pickles SC with Dr T Smith (Applicant) C Leggat SC (Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate