NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Johnson v Mackinnon (No 2) [2022] NSWCA 22 Hearing dates: Written submissions 30 August 2021; 13 September 2021; 23 September 2021 Date of orders: 24 February 2022 Decision date: 24 February 2022 Before: Macfarlan JA, Brereton JA and Simpson AJA at [1] Decision: Motion dismissed, with indemnity costs. Catchwords: JUDGMENTS AND ORDERS – Court of Appeal – Review of previous decision of the Court of Appeal – Application to set aside decision pursuant to UCPR r 36.16 or court's inherent jurisdiction – No identified matter raised in appeal overlooked – No misconception, misapprehension, oversight or inadvertence – Application dismissed COSTS – Party/Party – Unmeritorious application seeking to reargue unsuccessful appeal – Indemnity costs awarded Legislation Cited: (NSW) Partnership Act 1892, ss 34, 60, 67 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, r 36.16 Cases Cited: Autodesk Inc v Dyason (No 2) (1993) 176 CLR 300; [1993] HCA 6 Barrell Enterprises, Re [1973] 1 WLR 19; [1972] 3 All ER 631 Castle Constructions Pty Ltd v Sahab Holdings Pty Ltd (No 2) (2013) 87 ALJR 1159; [2013] HCA 44 Clifford v Timms [1908] AC 12 Commonwealth v Murray (1988) Aust Torts Reports 80-207 Elliott v The Queen (2007) 234 CLR 38; [2007] HCA 51 Fuller v Albert (No 2) [2021] NSWCA 183 Government Insurance Offıce (NSW) v Rosniak (1992) 27 NSWLR 665 Harvey v Phillips (1956) 95 CLR 235; [1956] HCA 27 Hill v Clifford [1907] 2 Ch 236 Hudgell Yeates & Co v Watson [1978] QB 451 Johnson v Mackinnon [2021] NSWCA 152 Lawrence v Ciantar (No 2) [2020] NSWCA 186 Mackinnon as plaintiff representative of 153 plaintiff group members v Partnership of Larter, Jones, Miraleste Pty Ltd t/as USG Partner and Johnson, t/as "STC Sports Trading Club" (No 3) [2018] NSWSC 86 Mackinnon as plaintiff representative of 153 plaintiff group members v Partnership of Larter, Jones, Miraleste Pty Ltd t/as USG Partner and Johnson, t/as "STC Sports Trading Club" (No 4) [2018] NSWSC 147 Mackinnon as plaintiff representative of 153 plaintiff group members v Partnership of Larter, Jones, Miraleste Pty Ltd t/as USG Partner and Johnson, t/as "STC Sports Trading Club" (No 5) (Supreme Court (NSW), Stevenson J, 22 February 2018, unrep) Mackinnon as plaintiff representative of 153 plaintiff group members v Partnership of Larter, Jones, Miraleste Pty Ltd t/as USG Partner and Johnson, t/as "STC Sports Trading Club" (No 7) [2019] NSWSC 103 Mackinnon as plaintiff representative of 153 plaintiff group members v Partnership of Larter, Jones, Miraleste Pty Ltd t/as USG Partner and Johnson, t/as "STC Sports Trading Club" (No 8) [2019] NSWSC 1658 Mackinnon as plaintiff representative of 153 plaintiff group members v Partnership of Larter, Jones, Miraleste Pty Ltd t/as USG Partner and Johnson, t/as "STC Sports Trading Club" (No 9) (Supreme Court (NSW), Stevenson J, 13 December 2019, unrep) Murray v Figge (1974) 4 ALR 612 New South Wales Bar Association v Smith [1991] NSWCA 215 Power v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (No 2) [2014] NSWCA 77; (2014) 98 ATR 75 R v Kupfer [1915] 2 KB 321 Raybos Australia Pty Ltd v Tectran Corp Pty Ltd [1993] NSWCA 226 Smith v New South Wales Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 256; [1992] HCA 36 St Nazaire Co, In Re (1879) 12 Ch D 88 State Rail Authority of New South Wales v Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd (1982) 150 CLR 29; [1982] HCA 51 Stoll v Paterson [1915] 18 WALR 42 The Texas Company (Australasia) Ltd v The Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1940) 63 CLR 382; [1940] HCA 9 Waterhouse v Independent Commission Against Corruption (No 2) [2015] NSWCA 362 Watson v Metropolitan (Perth) Passenger Transport Trust [1965] WAR 88 Wentworth v Rogers (No 9) (1987) 8 NSWLR 388 Wentworth v Woollahra Municipal Council (1982) 149 CLR 672; [1982] HCA 41 Winrobe Pty Ltd v Sundin's Building Co Pty Ltd (No 2) [1992] NSWCA 278 Category: Consequential orders Parties: Leigh Diane Johnson (Appellant) Ian Henry Mackinnon as representative plaintiff of 152 plaintiff group members (Respondents) Representation: Counsel: P Argy (solicitor) (Appellant) T J Dixon (Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate