NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Jarvis v Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd [2022] NSWSC 161 Hearing dates: 27 May 2021 Decision date: 24 February 2022 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Administrative Law Before: McCallum JA Decision: 1. Dismiss the summons. 2. The applicant is to pay the respondent's costs. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW — Jurisdictional error — Decision by Review Panel under Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW) — Whether Panel failed to respond to a substantial argument — Whether Panel decided the matter on a basis of which the plaintiff was not given notice — Function of Panel to make a new assessment Legislation Cited: Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW), ss 60, 61, 63 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 69 Cases Cited: Allianz Australia Insurance Limited v Cervantes [2012] NSWCA 244; (2012) 61 MVR 443 Dranichnikov v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2003] HCA 26; 77 ALJR 1088 Frost v Kourouche (2014) 86 NSWLR 214; [2014] NSWCA 39 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf (2001) 206 CLR 323; [2001] HCA 30 QBE Insurance v Alawia [2016] NSWSC 1875 Rodger v De Gelder [2015] NSWCA 211 Wingfoot Australia Partners Pty Ltd v Kocak (2013) 252 CLR 480; [2013] HCA 43 Category: Principal judgment Parties: M Jarvis (Plaintiff) Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: R De Meyrick (Plaintiff) J Gumbert & M J Jones (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate