NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Morris v Webb [2022] NSWCATAP 54 Hearing dates: 15 February 2022 Date of orders: 25 February 2022 Decision date: 25 February 2022 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: G Curtin SC, Senior Member J Currie, Senior Member Decision: 1. Appeal upheld. 2. The order of the Tribunal made on 4 November 2021 is set aside. 3. The matter is remitted to the Tribunal, differently constituted, to be determined according to law. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW — particular administrative bodies — NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal — procedural fairness — failure to give reasons — adequacy of reasons – no question of principle Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), s 38(2) Cases Cited: Allen v TriCare (Hastings) Ltd [2016] NSWCATAP 216 Cominos v Di Rico [2016] NSWCATAP 5 Gautam v Health Care Complaints Commission [2021] NSWCA 85 Makita (Australia) Pty Ltd v Sprowles (2001) 52 NSWLR 705; [2001] NSWCA 305 Pollard v RRR Corporation Pty Ltd [2009] NSWCA 110 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Christopher Morris (Appellant) Andrew Webb (Respondent) Representation: Appellant (Self-Represented) Respondent (Self-Represented) File Number(s): 2021/00339214 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Citation: N/A Date of Decision: 4 November 2021 Before: F Holles, General Member File Number(s): HB 21/33400
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate