NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Fisher v Upper Lachlan Shire Council [2022] NSWCATAD 65 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 2 March 2022 Decision date: 02 March 2022 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: S Higgins, Senior Member Decision: (1) The decision of the Council, made on 3 August 2020, is affirmed. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – merits review – access to government information – decision of the public sector agency that the information for which the applicant sought access was not held by the agency – reasonableness of searches for the information sought Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 (NSW) Freedom of Information Act 1989 (NSW)(repealed) Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 (NSW) Inclosed Lands Protection Act 1901 (NSW) Cases Cited: Cianfrano v Director General Department of Commerce [2006] NSWADT 195 Commissioner of Police v Danis [2017] NSWCATAP 7 Fisher v Goulburn Mulwaree Council [2019] NSWCATAD 34 Fisher v Roads and Maritime Services NSW [2018] NSWCATAD 52 John Leo Fisher v R [2019] NSWDC 297 Wojciechowska v Commissioner of Police [2020] NSWCATAP 173 Texts Cited: None cited Category: Principal judgment Parties: John Fisher (Applicant) Upper Lachlan Shire Council (Respondent) Representation: Applicant (self-represented) A Croke (Director Finance and Administration of the Upper Lachlan Shire Council) (Respondent) File Number(s): 2020/00024774 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate