NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Songcuan (No. 3) [2022] NSWSC 188 Hearing dates: 28 February 2022 Date of orders: 1 March 2022 Decision date: 01 March 2022 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: Dhanji J Decision: The partial defence of extreme provocation should be left to the jury Legislation Cited: Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007 (NSW) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Cases Cited: Braysich v The Queen (2011) 243 CLR 434; [2011] HCA 14 Green v The Queen (1997) 191 CLR 334 Heron v The Queen (2003) 140 A Crim R 317; [2003] HCA 17 Johnson v The Queen (1976) 136 CLR 619; [1976] HCA 44 Lake Macquarie City Council v Morris (2005) 63 NSWLR 263; [2005] NSWSC 387 Lindsay v The Queen (2015) 255 CLR 272; [2015] HCA 16 R v Chhay (1994) 72 A Crim R 1 R v Croft [1981] 1 NSWLR 126 Rogers v R (2021) 104 NSWLR 305; [2021] NSWCCA 61 Stingel v The Queen (1990) 171 CLR 312 The Queen v R (1981) 28 SASR 321; (1981) 4 A Crim R 127 Van Den Hoek v The Queen (1986) 161 CLR 158 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Regina (Crown) Engracio Songcuan (Accused) Representation: Counsel: A Robertson (Crown) B Royce (Accused)
Solicitors: Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown) Chidiac Lawyers (Accused) File Number(s): 2020/131543 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate