NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: ZVN v ZVO [2022] NSWCATAP 57 Hearing dates: 14 October 2022 Date of orders: 2 March 2022 Decision date: 02 March 2022 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: C P Fougere, Principal Member J S Currie, Senior Member (Legal) J Le Breton, General Member (Community) Decision: (1) Leave to appeal refused. (2) Appeal otherwise dismissed. (3) Time for lodgment of appeal extended to 2 July 2021. (4) ZZG joined as Third Respondent. Catchwords: APPEAL – Guardianship Division – review of Division's decision as to identity of guardian – appellant found to be unsuitable – whether tests of suitability misapplied – procedural fairness – adequacy of reasons for decision – no error of law – appeal dismissed – no grounds for grant of leave to appeal – leave refused. PROCEDURE – Appeal from Guardianship Division – obligation to assist unrepresented appellant in ascertaining or formulating grounds for appeal. Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), Pt 6 Div 2; ss 38(1)-(3), 38(4), 41, 80, 80(2)(b) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules (NSW), rr 25(4)(c), 25(4A) Guardianship Act 1987 (NSW), ss 4, 4(a), 4(c)-(d), 14, 15, 16, 17(1), 17(1)(c) Cases Cited: Baker v David [2015] NSWCA 235 BHP Billiton Ltd v Dunning [2013] NSWCA 421 Collins v Urban [2014] NSWCATAP 17 Cominos v Di Rico [2016] NSWCATAP 5 Nakad v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2014] NSWCATAP 10 Prendergast v Western Murray Irrigation Ltd [2014] NSWCATAP 69 Resource Pacific Pty Limited v Wilkinson [2013] NSWCA 44 Secretary, Department of Family and Community Services v Smith [2017] NSWCA 206 Stoker v Adecco Gemvale Constructions Pty Ltd & Anor [2004] NSWCA 449 Walsh v Visionstream [2004] NSWCA 104 Whisprun Pty Ltd v Dixon [2003] HCA 48; 77 ALJR 1598 ZGB v ZGC [2018] NSWCATAP 58 at [27]-[30] and ZAN v Public Guardian [2016] NSWCATAP 20 ZTO v Central Coast Local Health District [2021] NSWCATAP 160 Category: Principal judgment Parties: ZVN (Appellant) ZVO (First Respondent) Public Guardian (Second Respondent) ZZG (Third Respondent) Representation: Counsel: P De Dassel (Separate Representative of First Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate