NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Camelo-Gomez (No 2) [2022] NSWSC 211 Hearing dates: 28 February 2022, 1 and 2 March 2022 Date of orders: 3 March 2022 Decision date: 03 March 2022 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Wilson J Decision: 1. See reasons, and the schedule annexed to this judgment as to admissibility of hearsay evidence 2. Evidence as to [redacted] is excluded Catchwords: CRIME – trial – pre-trial hearing to determine admissibility of disputed evidence – hearsay evidence Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Cases Cited: Azizi v The Queen [2012] VSCA 205 Harris v The Queen [2005] NSWCCA 432; (2005) 158 A Crim R 454 Prasad v R [2020] NSWCCA 349 R v BD (1997) 94 A Crim R 131 R v Camelo-Gomez [2022] NSWSC 136 R v Grogan & Slacke (No 1) [2013] NSWSC 1191 R v Kuzmanovic [2005] NSWSC 771 R v Ryan [2020] NSWSC 1394 R v Singh (No 4) [2021] NSWSC 75 R v Tarantino [2019] NSWSC 939 R v Toki (No. 3) [2000] NSWSC 999 Sio v The Queen [2016] HCA 32; 259 CLR 47 Williams v The Queen [2000] FCA 1868; (2000) 119 A Crim R 490 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Regina Isabela Carolina Camelo-Gomez Representation: Counsel: D Scully & G Steedman (Crown) B Rigg SC & C Wasley (Accused)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate