NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Grant (No 2) [2022] NSWDC 46 Hearing dates: 01, 02, 05, 08, 22 and 26 November 2021 - Trial 11 February 2022 - Sentence Date of orders: 04 March 2022 Decision date: 04 March 2022 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Hatzistergos DCJ Decision: See [185] onwards Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW –– Driving offences – Dangerous driving occasioning death – Failing to stop and assist – Police pursuit – Intoxication – Erratic driving –Consideration of impact of alcohol and mild cognitive impairment on decision to drive – Assessment of moral culpability in light of aggravating factors considered in R v Whyte SENTENCE –– High degree of moral culpability for dangerous driving offence – Failing to stop and assist offence found below mid-range – Police pursuit offence found below the mid-range and towards the lower range – Mid-range PCA dealt with by conviction with no other penalty – Offender found to have excellent prospects of rehabilitation and a low risk of re-offending SENTENCE –– Substantial harm to the victim recognised by the Court – Assistance fully taken into account – Offender of prior good character – No prior criminal convictions – Remorse established – Offender found to be of poor physical and mental health – Intoxicating effects not taken into account as a mitigating matter on sentence but considered in light of the Offender's deteriorating mental health resorting him to alcohol – Impacts of COVID-19 on prisoners considered Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) s 52A Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Act 1999 (NSW) s 276 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) ss 10A, 21A, Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) ss 166, Road Transport Act 2013 (NSW) ss 110, 205D Cases Cited: Adam v R [2014] NSWCCA 265 Hoskins v R [2020] NSWCA 18 Markarian v R (2005) 228 CLR 357 Muldrock v R (2011) 244 CLR 120 Pullen v R [2018] NSWCCA 264 R v Casey [2015] NSWCCA 142 R v De Simoni [1981] HCA 31; (1981) 147 CLR 383 R v Dunlop [2001] NSWCCA 435 R v Grant [2021] NSWDC 643 R v Holyoak (1995) 82 A Crim R 502 R v Khatter [2000] NSWCCA 32 R v Manok [2017] NSWCCA 232 R v McIntyre (1988) 38 A Crim R 135 R v Minna [2013] NSWDC 104 R v Raymond [2019] NSWDC 579 R v Shashati [2018] NSWCCA 167 R v Taula [2015] NSWCCA 8 R v Whyte (2002) 55 NSWLR 252; 134 A Crim R 53 Shumack v R [2008] NSWCCA 311 WW v R [2012] NSWCCA 165 Category: Sentence Parties: Mr Kenneth Wayne Grant (the Offender) Regina (the Crown) Representation: Counsel: Mr P Boulten SC (the Offender) Mr L Carr SC (the Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate