NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Mae v STM123 No.11 Pty Ltd [2022] NSWCATAP 61 Hearing dates: 24 February 2022 Date of orders: 8 March 2022 Decision date: 08 March 2022 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: S Thode, Senior Member A Boxall, Senior Member Decision: 1. Leave to appeal is refused. 2. The appeal is dismissed. Catchwords: RESIDENTIAL TENANCY – appeal against order for termination and possession of premises - warrant executed – utility of hearing the appeal – notice of termination retaliatory - decision not fair and equitable Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules 2014 (NSW), Cases Cited: Collins v Urban [2014] NSWCATAP 17 Pholi v Wearne [2014] NSWCATAP 78 Prendergast v Western Murray Irrigation Ltd [2014] NSWCATAP 69 Ryan v BKB Motor Vehicle Repairs Pty Ltd [2017] NSWCATAP 39 Texts Cited: None cited Category: Principal judgment Parties: Garnet Mae (Appellant) STM123 No.11 Pty Ltd (Respondent) Representation: Appellant (Self-represented) V Blank (Respondent) File Number(s): 2021/00314312 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Consumer and Commercial Division Jurisdiction: NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal Citation: [2020] NSWCATCD Date of Decision: 6 October 2021 Before: P Smith, General Member File Number(s): RT 21/39146
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate