NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v BK [2022] NSWCCA 51 Hearing dates: 22 October 2021 Date of orders: 16 March 2022 Decision date: 16 March 2022 Before: Johnson J at [1]; Rothman J at [170]; Hamill J at [224]. Decision: By majority, pursuant to s.107(5) Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW), affirm the acquittal of the Respondent entered by Judge Jeffreys in the District Court on 30 March 2021. Catchwords: CRIME – acquittal after Judge-alone trial – child sexual abuse offences allegedly committed in 1985 – complainant a 12-year old student at school where accused was a teacher – Crown appeal against acquittal under s.107 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 – appeal on grounds involving questions of law alone – unchallenged evidence admitted at trial as tendency evidence – accused had committed child sexual abuse offences against two other 13-year old students from school between 1985 and 1987– first ground asserted that Judge failed to take tendency evidence into account in acquitting accused – second ground asserted that, if tendency evidence taken into account, Judge erred by failing to record findings concerning tendency evidence - consideration of significance of unchallenged tendency evidence – duty to give reasons – first ground rejected (by majority) – second ground upheld (by majority) – whether discretion should be exercised to quash acquittals and order a new trial – discretionary considerations - held (by majority) that acquittals should not be quashed and a new trial ordered – Crown appeal dismissed - acquittals of accused affirmed under s.107(5) Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 Legislation Cited: Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Cases Cited: AK v Western Australia (2008) 232 CLR 438; [2008] HCA 8 Allied Pastoral Holdings Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [1983] 1 NSWLR 1 Attorney General for NSW v X (2000) 49 NSWLR 653; [2000] NSWCCA 199 Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321; [1990] HCA 33 BRC v R [2020] NSWCCA 176 Browne v Dunn (1893) 6 R 67 Campbelltown City Council v Vegan & Ors (2006) 67 NSWLR 372; [2006] NSWCA 284 Collector of Customs v Pozzolanic (1993) FCR 280; [1993] FCA 456 Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v Wililo [2012] NSWSC 713; (2012) 222 A Crim R 106 DL v The Queen (2018) 266 CLR 1; [2018] HCA 26 Douglass v The Queen (2012) 86 ALJR 1086; [2012] HCA 34 Elomar v R [2014] NSWCCA 303; (2014) 300 FLR 323 Fleming v The Queen (1998) 197 CLR 250; [1998] HCA 68 Gilham v R [2012] NSWCCA 131; (2012) 224 A Crim R 22 Hopgood v R [2019] NSWCCA 246 Hughes v The Queen (2017) 263 CLR 338; [2017] HCA 20 IMM v R (2016) 257 CLR 300; [2016] HCA 14 Khorami v R; R v Khorami [2021] NSWCCA 228 Llewellyn v R [2011] NSWCCA 66 Malec v JC Hutton Pty Ltd (1990) 169 CLR 638; [1990] HCA 20 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259; [1996] HCA 6 R v BA [2021] NSWCCA 191 R v Bauer (2018) 266 CLR 56; [2018] HCA 40 R v Jovanovic (1997) 42 NSWLR 520 R v JS [2007] NSWCCA 272; (2007) 175 A Crim R 108 R v Lazarus [2017] NSWCCA 279; (2017) 270 A Crim R 378 R v PL (2009) 199 A Crim R 199; [2009] NSWCCA 256 R v PL (No. 2) [2012] NSWCCA 31 R v Speechley [2012] NSWCCA 130; (2012) 221 A Crim R 175 R v XHR [2012] NSWCCA 247 Sheppard v Blakey and Ors [2001] WASCA 309 The Queen v Hillier (2007) 228 CLR 618; [2007] HCA 13 Thornton v R [2017] NSWCCA 86 Toohey v R [2020] NSWCCA 166 Wade v R [2018] NSWCCA 85 Wainohu v State of New South Wales (2011) 243 CLR 181; [2011] HCA 24 Winner v R (1995) 79 A Crim R 528; (Court of Criminal Appeal (NSW), 14 July 1995, unrep) Texts Cited: --- Category: Principal judgment Parties: Regina (Appellant) BK (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Ms B Baker (Appellant) Mr TD Anderson SC (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate