NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: NSW Land and Housing Corporation v Boyd [2022] NSWCATCD 11 Hearing dates: 9 February 2022 Date of orders: 10 February 2022 Decision date: 10 February 2022 Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Before: G Blake AM SC, Senior Member Decision: (1) The proceedings are dismissed. Catchwords: LEASES AND TENANCIES – Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (NSW) — whether a termination order should be made by reason of the frustration of the residential tenancy agreement due to the premises being wholly uninhabitable Legislation Cited: Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (NSW) Cases Cited: De Soleil v Palmhide Pty Ltd [2010] NSWCTTT 464 Roberts v NSW Aboriginal Housing Office [2017] NSWCATAP 9 Stokes v Zarimis [2021] NSWCATCD 23 Taylor v Reilly [2021] NSWCATCD 74 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: NSW Land and Housing Corporation (Applicant) Judith Ann Boyd (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Department of Communities and Justice (Applicant) Marrickville Legal Centre (Respondent) File Number(s): SH 21/48900 Publication restriction: Nil
REASONS FOR DECISION
Overview 1. In these proceedings the applicant, NSW Land and Housing Corporation, which is a social housing provider and the landlord, seeks termination and possession orders against the respondent, Judith Ann Boyd, who is the tenant of premises at Strathfield (the premises) under a residential tenancy agreement between them. 2. I have decided to dismiss the proceedings.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate