NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: In the matter of PIC Lindfield 19 Pty Ltd (in liq) [2022] NSWSC 271 Hearing dates: 7 and 11 March 2022 Date of orders: 15 March 2022 Decision date: 15 March 2022 Jurisdiction: Equity - Corporations List Before: Williams J Decision: Application dismissed, see paragraph [132]. Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – winding up – where company in liquidation – examination of persons about examinable affairs of corporation – application to set aside summonses issued under Corporations Act s 596B for examination – whether examinees have an arguable case to discharge the examination summonses for alleged material non-disclosure – where examinees are parties to pending civil proceedings – where substantial overlap between issues in pending civil proceedings and company's examinable affairs – where no evidence that liquidators are involved or presently intend to be involved in pending civil proceedings – no material nondisclosure – whether, if summons not discharged, examination should be conducted in private – whether forensic advantage afforded to party means examination should be conducted in private Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 68 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss 237, 439C, 440D, 500, 596A, 596B, 596C, 1317E, 1317H, 1317J Cases Cited: Accord Pacific Holdings Pty Ltd v Accord Pacific Land Pty Ltd (in liq) [2011] NSWSC 707 Hong Kong Bank of Australia Limited v Murphy (1992) 28 NSWLR 512 In the matter of Mendarma Pty Ltd (in liq) (2006) 24 ACLC 1611; [2006] NSWSC 1306 In the matter of One Twenty Seven Corporation Pty Ltd (1995) 13 ACLC 1600 In the matter of Coretel Pty Ltd; Linker v Nilant (2003) 48 ACSR 178 New Zealand Steel (Australia) Pty Ltd v Burton (1994) 13 ACSR 610 O'Brien v Wily (2009) 76 NSWLR 428; (2009) 74 ACSR 145; [2009] NSWSC 946 Re Equititrust Ltd (in liq) (receivers and managers apptd) (2017) 122 ACSR 299; [2017] FCA 758 Sutherland v Pascoe; In the matter of Matrix Group Limited as trustee for the Matrix Group Unit Trust (in liq) ACN 061 549 371 [2013] FCAFC 15 Walton v ACN 004 410 833 Limited (formerly Arrium Ltd) (in liq) [2022] HCA 3 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Marlas Maole Zhu (First Applicant) Qizhen Zhu (Second Applicant) Meijuan Pang (Third Applicant) Moussa Taktak (Fourth Applicant) Zaki Hajjar (Fifth Applicant) Australia Property Management & Services Pty Ltd (Sixth Applicant) Monado Constructions Pty Ltd (Seventh Applicant) Guardian Accounting Services Pty Ltd (Eighth Applicant) PIC Warriewood Pty Ltd (Ninth Applicant) PIC Caddens 1 Pty Ltd (Tenth Applicant) PIC Paramatta 1 Pty Ltd (Eleventh Applicant) PIC Royal Investments Pty Ltd (Twelfth Applicant) PIC Warrawee 1 Pty Ltd (Thirteenth Applicant) Primo Investment Corporation Pty Ltd (Fourteenth Applicant) Sky Financial Services Pty Ltd (Fifteenth Applicant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate