Choi v NSW Ombudsman (No 5) [2022] NSWCATAD 92

Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Choi v NSW Ombudsman (No 5) [2022] NSWCATAD 92 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 17 March 2022 Decision date: 17 March 2022 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: M Tibbey, Senior Member Decision: (1) Leave for the applicant to proceed with a claim of discrimination pursuant to section 96 is refused. (2) Leave for the applicant to proceed with a claim of victimisation pursuant to section 96 is refused. Catchwords: Discrimination – Victimisation – Leave to proceed –determination 'on the papers'. Legislation Cited: Anti-Discrimination Act, 1977 – (NSW) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act, 2013 (NSW) Cases Cited: Burns v Sunol (No 2) [2017] NSWCATAD 236 Chen v Commissioner NSW Police Force [2020] NSWCATAD 245Dutt v Central Coast Area Health Service [2002] NSWADT 133 Ekermawi v Administrative Decisions Tribunal of New South Wales [2009] NSWSC 143 Frost v Southern Cross University [2020] NSWCATAD 105 IW v City of Perth (1997) 1912 CLR 1 Jones v Ekermawi [2009] NSWCCA 388 Sivananthan v Commissioner of Police [2001] NSWADT 44 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Jae Hee Choi (Applicant) NSW Ombudsman Representation: Applicant (self-represented) M Smith (Legal Counsel, NSW Ombudsman) (Respondent) File Number(s): 2018/00299612 Publication restriction: Nil