NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Dougas; R v Read; R v Linke (No 9) [2022] NSWSC 299 Hearing dates: 17 March 2022 Date of orders: 17 March 2022 Decision date: 21 March 2022 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Adamson J Decision: The applications by the accused Mark Read and the accused Geoffrey Linke for directed verdicts of acquittal are refused. Catchwords: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE — Trial — Verdict by direction — 'no case to answer' application by accused — where Crown case based on circumstantial evidence — where application dismissed Legislation Cited: Criminal Code (Cth), s 70.1 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 66, 69, 165 Cases Cited: Ahern v The Queen (1988) 165 CLR 87; [1988] HCA 39 Constantinidis v R; Lazar v R [2022] NSWCCA 4 Doney v The Queen (1990) 171 CLR 207; [1990] HCA 51 Gant v R [2017] VSCA 104 May v O'Sullivan (1955) 92 CLR 654; [1955] HCA 38 Reg v Galbraith [1981] 1 WLR 1039 R v Saffron (No 1) (1988) 17 NSWLR 395 The Queen v LK (2010) 241 CLR 177; [2010] HCA 17 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Proceedings 2018/150442 Regina Paul Peter Dougas (Accused)
Proceedings 2018/150387 Regina Mark Andrew Read (Accused)
Proceedings 2018/150400 Regina Geoffrey Kym Linke (Accused) Representation: Counsel: S Flood / K Heath (Crown) N Clelland QC / S Pararajasingham (Paul Peter Dougas) P Boulten SC / J Gullaci (Mark Andrew Read) I Hill QC / C Morgan (Geoffrey Kym Linke)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate