NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Dougas; R v Read; R v Linke (No 10) [2022] NSWSC 306 Hearing dates: 21 March 2022 Date of orders: 21 March 2022 Decision date: 22 March 2022 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Adamson J Decision: Refuse applications for directions in accordance with R v Murray (1987) 11 NSWLR 12 and Shepherd v The Queen (1990) 170 CLR 573; [1990] HCA 56. Catchwords: CRIME – application for Murray and Shepherd directions to be given in respect of direct evidence of a conspiracy – pre-requisites not met – applications refused Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5F(3A) Cases Cited: Chamberlain v The Queen (No 2) (1984) 153 CLR 521; [1984] HCA 7 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v Dougas; Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v Read; Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v Linke [2022] NSWCCA 19 Gould v R; R v Gould [2021] NSWCCA 92 R v Dougas; R v Read; R v Linke (No 9) [2022] NSWSC 299 R v Murray (1987) 11 NSWLR 12 Shepherd v The Queen (1990) 170 CLR 573; [1990] HCA 56 Texts Cited: Wigmore on Evidence, vol 9 (Chadbourn rev. 1981) Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Proceedings 2018/150442 Regina Paul Peter Dougas (Accused)
Proceedings 2018/150387 Regina Mark Andrew Read (Accused)
Proceedings 2018/150400 Regina Geoffrey Kym Linke (Accused) Representation: Counsel: S Flood / K Heath (Crown) N Clelland QC / S Pararajasingham (Paul Peter Dougas) P Boulten SC / J Gullaci (Mark Andrew Read) I Hill QC / C Morgan (Geoffrey Kym Linke)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate