NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Huynh v R [2022] NSWCCA 60 Hearing dates: 17 March 2022 Date of orders: 17 March 2022 Decision date: 17 March 2022 Before: Beech-Jones CJ at CL at [1] Bellew J at [42] Ierace J at [43] Decision: (1) Appeal allowed; (2) Vacate the ruling made by the trial judge on 14 March 2022 excluding the compilation of the CCTV footage pursuant to s 56 of the Evidence Act; (3) Vacate the ruling made by the trial judge on 14 March 2022 excluding the compilation of the CCTV footage pursuant to s 137 of the Evidence Act; and (4) Vacate the ruling made by the trial judge on 14 March 2022 excluding the compilation of the CCTV footage pursuant to s 135 of the Evidence Act. Catchwords: APPEAL – interlocutory ruling rejecting Crown evidence – CCTV footage – assessment of relevance – no question of principle Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Evidence Act 1995 Cases Cited: IMM v The Queen (2016) 257 CLR 300; [2016] HCA 14 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Regina (Applicant) Cong Huy Huynh (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Ms M Kumar; Ms E Curran (Applicant) I Wallach (Respondent)
Solicitors: Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Applicant) Karim and Nicol Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 2018/268774 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court Jurisdiction: Criminal Date of Decision: 14 March 2022 Before: Coleman SC DCJ File Number(s): 2018/268774
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate