NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: LCT-MRE Nominees Pty Ltd (as trustee of the LCT-MRE Trust and in its personal capacity) v Thiess Pty Ltd [2022] NSWSC 317 Hearing dates: 7-8 March 2022; further submissions 11, 15 & 18 March 2022 Date of orders: 23 March 2022 Decision date: 23 March 2022 Jurisdiction: Equity - Commercial List Before: Stevenson J Decision: Plaintiffs granted leave on terms to rely on further expert evidence Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – whether expert evidence served permitted by earlier order – whether such evidence is evidence in chief – whether plaintiffs require and should be granted leave to rely on that evidence – on what terms should such leave be granted Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Category: Procedural rulings Parties: LCT-MRE Nominees Pty Ltd (as trustee of the LCT MRE Trust and in its personal capacity) (First Plaintiff) LCT-MRE Pty Ltd (Second Plaintiff) Thiess Pty Ltd (First Defendant and First Cross-Claimant) John Holland Pty Ltd (Second Defendant and Second Cross-Claimant) CIMIC Group Ltd (Third Defendant) WSP Australia Pty Ltd formerly Parsons Brinckerhoff Australia Pty Limited (First Cross-Defendant) ACN 006 475 056 Pty Limited formerly Parsons Brinckerhoff International (Australia) Pty Limited (Second Cross-Defendant) Representation: Counsel: T Breakspear SC with L Shipway (Plaintiffs) P S Braham SC with N Simpson (Defendants) J Giles SC (First and Second Cross-Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate