NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Tukel v Commissioner of Police [2022] NSWCATAD 104 Hearing dates: 11 November 2021 Date of orders: 25 March 2022 Decision date: 25 March 2022 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: S Montgomery, Senior Member Decision: (1) The decision under review is affirmed. Catchwords: Administrative Law – firearms – firearms prohibition order – whether person 'not fit, in the public interest' –association with an outlaw motorcycle gang Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 (NSW) Firearms Act 1996 (NSW) Weapons Prohibition Act 1998 (NSW) Cases Cited: Adams v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2017] NSWCATAD 194 Addison v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2019] NSWCATAD 99 Azzopardi v Commissioner of Police New South Wales Police Force [2013] NSWADT 205 Bassal v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2017] NSWCATAD 276 Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force v Bazzi & Ors [2021] NSWSC 1150 Constantin v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2013] NSWADTAP 16 Dalziell v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2018] NSWCATAD 79 Drake v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1979) 2 ALD 60 at 77 Fahma v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2021] NSWDC 329 Hamid v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2018] NSWCATAD 43 Kocic v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force (2014) 88 NSWLR 159 Sciberras v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2015] NSWCATAD 206. Stamatelatos v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2018] NSWCATAD 156 Stealth Enterprises Pty Ltd v Calliden Insurance Ltd [2015] NSWSC 1270 Tolley v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Service [2006] NSWADT 149 Tukel v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2020] NSWCATAD 63. Tukel v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2021] NSWCATAD 60 Texts Cited: None cited Category: Principal judgment Parties: Fidel Tukel (Applicant) Commissioner of Police (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: G Stanton (Applicant) C Mantziaris (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate