NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: MA v R [2022] NSWCCA 61 Hearing dates: 14 February 2022 Date of orders: 25 March 2022 Decision date: 25 March 2022 Before: Macfarlan JA at [1]; Bellew J at [71]; Dhanji J at [72] Decision: (1) Refuse extension of time to appeal. (2) Dismiss application for leave to appeal. Catchwords: CRIME — appeals — appeal against conviction — whether guilty verdicts unreasonable by reason of inconsistency with not guilty verdicts Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 61M(1), 61M(2), 66A, 66A(2), 66C(2), 344A Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 6(1) Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), Pt 29, Sch 2 Div 2, s 84(2), Div 3, s 88 Cases Cited: BF v R [2019] NSWCCA 321 DS v R [2021] NSWCCA Holloway v R [2017] NSWCCA 17 Jones v The Queen (1997) 191 CLR 439; [1997] HCA 56 Libke v The Queen (2007) 230 CLR 559; [2007] HCA 30 M v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 487 MacKenzie v The Queen (1996) 190 CLR 348; [1996] HCA 35 MFA v The Queen (2002) 213 CLR 606; [2002] HCA 53 MG v R [2017] NSWCCA 14 Nyguyen v R [2017] NSWCCA 145 Pell v The Queen (2020) 268 CLR 123; [2020] HCA 12 R v Baden-Clay (2016) 258 CLR 308; [2016] HCA 35 R v Markuleski (2001) 52 NSWLR 82; [2001] NSWCCA 290 R v TK (2009) 74 NSWLR 299; [2009] NSWCCA 151 RD (a pseudonym) v R [2021] NSWCCA Vasilevski v R [2019] NSWCCA 277 Z (a pseudonym) v R [2022] NSWCCA 8 Category: Principal judgment Parties: MA (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: A Moutasallum (Applicant) C Curtis (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate