NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Lechowski v Anstee [2022] NSWDC 81 Hearing dates: 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18 March 2022 Date of orders: 25 March 2022 Decision date: 25 March 2022 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: J Smith SC DCJ Decision: (1) Judgment and verdict for each of the defendants. (2) The plaintiff is to pay the defendants' costs. (3) If any party seeks a variation of order (2): (a) That party must file and serve written submissions of no more than 5 pages together with any affidavit within 14 days of these orders; (b) Any party opposing any variation sought in accordance with order 3(a) must file and serve submissions of no more than 5 pages and any affidavit in support within 28 days of these orders; and (c) Any application for variation will be heard on the papers. Catchwords: TORTS – Intentional torts – unlawful arrest, imprisonment, assault and battery – negligence – causation – no medical evidence Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), ss 3B, 5B, 5D, 5E Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 545B Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007 (NSW), s 13(1) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 140 Cases Cited: Alcan Gove Pty Ltd v Zabic (2015) 257 CLR 1 Armagas Ltd v Mundogas SA (The Ocean Frost) [1985] 1 Lloyd's Rep 1 at 57 Barton v Armstrong [1969] 2 NSWLR 451 Bird v Jones (1845) 7 QB 742 Blacket v Barnett [2017] NSWSC 1032 Brighten v Traino [2019] NSWCA 168 Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336 Chief Commissioner of State Revenue v Adams Bidco Pty Ltd [2019] NSWCA 34 Croucher v Cachia [2016] NSWCA 132 Gulic v Boral Transport Ltd [2016] NSWCA 269 Hutchinson Construction Services Pty Ltd v Fogg; Fog v Les Quatre Musketeers Pty Ltd (t/as Plastamasta South Coast) [2016] NSWCA 135 In the matter of Bellpac Pty Limited (Receivers and Managers Appointed) (In Liq) (No 2) [2011] FCA 1123 In the matter of Kit Digital Australia Pty Ltd (in liq) [2014] NSWSC 1547 McDonald v Coles Myer Limited (1995) Aust Torts Reports 81-361 Nevin v B & R Enclosures [2004] NSWCA 339 Rixon v Star City Pty Ltd (2001) 53 NSWLR 98 Sangha v Baxter [2009] NSWCA 78 State of New South Wales v McMaster [2015] NSWCA 228 Tame v New South Wales (2002) 211 CLR 317 Uren v John Fairfax & Sons Pty Ltd (1966) 117 CLR 118 Wallace v Kam (2013) 250 CLR 375 Warner v Hung Wolfenden v International Theme Park Pty Ltd [2008] NSWCA 78 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Lisa Lechowski – Plaintiff Hugh Anstee – Defendant 1 Matthew Hall – Defendant 2 Dural Rugby Club – Defendant 3 Sydney West Rugby Referees' Association – Defendant 4 NSW Rugby Union – Defendant 5 Rugby Australia – Defendant 6 State of New South Wales – Defendant 7 Representation: Plaintiff (self-represented)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate