NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Starr v Miller [2022] NSWCA 46 Hearing dates: 22 November 2021 Date of orders: 29 March 2022 Decision date: 29 March 2022 Before: Macfarlan JA at [1]; Meagher JA at [72]; White JA at [73] Decision: Appeal dismissed with costs. Catchwords: SUCCESSION — contested probate application —whether the deceased had testamentary capacity at the time she gave instructions for and executed the will — whether the deceased knew and approved of the terms of the will — whether deceased's statement that she was not agreeable to one of her daughters getting any money was a reference to a testamentary gift — whether any "suspicious circumstances" Legislation Cited: Succession Act 2006 (NSW) Cases Cited: ASIC v Hellicar (2013) 247 CLR 345; [2012] HCA 17 Bailey v Bailey (1924) 34 CLR 558; [1924] HCA 21 Banks v Goodfellow (1870) LR 5 QB 549 Boughton v Knight (1873) LR 3 P&D 64 Drivas v Jakopovic (2019) 100 NSWLR 505; [2019] NSWCA 218 Frizzo v Frizzo [2011] QCA 308 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298; [1959] HCA 8 Mekhail v Hana; Mekail v Hana [2019] NSWCA 197 Nicholson v Knaggs [2009] VSC 64 Payne v Parker [1976] 1 NSWLR 191 Zorbas v Sidiropoulous (No 2) [2009] NSWCA 197 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Susan Maree Starr (Appellant) Margo Anne Miller (First Respondent) David Patrick Brough (Second Respondent) Bradford Frederick McInnes Stuart (Third Respondent) Representation: Counsel: R D Wilson SC (Appellant) C Harris SC (Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate