NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Marino (a pseudonym) v Bello (a pseudonym) [2022] NSWCA 50 Hearing dates: 28 March 2022 Date of orders: 28 March 2022 Decision date: 28 March 2022 Before: Basten JA Decision: (1) Dismiss the notice of motion of 5 November 2021 in respect of the application for pro bono assistance. (2) Dismiss the notice of motion of 25 March 2022. (3) The applicant to pay the costs of the 3-5th respondents on the motion. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for referral for pro bono assistance – previous applications – one in unrelated matter – one where assistance not obtained – lack of obvious merit – nature of discretion Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 7.36 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Marino (a pseudonym) (Applicant) Bello (a pseudonym) (First Respondent) Bello (a pseudonym) (Second Respondent) Mark Rowlandson (Third Respondent) Colin Rowlandson (Fourth Respondent) Victoria Rowlandson (Fifth Respondent) State of New South Wales (Sixth Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Applicant self-represented Mr B McManus (Third to Fifth Respondents) Mr R Coffey (Sixth Respondent)
Solicitors: Applicant self-represented Colin Biggers & Paisley (Third to Fifth Respondents) Sparke Helmore (Sixth Respondent) File Number(s): 2021/175377
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate