NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Kershaw [2022] NSWDC 90 Hearing dates: 21 March 2022 – 23 March 2022 Date of orders: 29 March 2022 Decision date: 29 March 2022 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Wilson SC DCJ Decision: The arrest was unlawful. The police officers were not acting in the execution of their duties when they were violently assaulted by the accused. The verdict on counts 3 and 5 of the indictment is not guilty. Catchwords: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE — Trial — Judge alone – intimidation – assault – assault police officer in execution of duty occasioning actual bodily harm – assault occasioning actual bodily harm. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) s 60(2) Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) s 133 Law Enforcement (Powers & Responsibility) Act 2002 (NSW) ss 4, 201, 202 Cases Cited: AK v Western Australia [2008] HCA 8 Fleming v R (1998) 197 CLR 250 Christie and Leachinski [1947] AC 573 Adams v Kennedy (2009) 49 NSWLR 78 State of New South Wales v Delly (2007) 70 NSWLR 125 State of New South Wales v Smith (2017) 95 NSWLR 662 Robinson v State of New South Wales (2018) 100 NSWLR 782 New South Wales v Robinson (2019) 266 CLR 619 Coleman v Power [2004] HCA 39 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Regina Mr William Peter Kershaw Representation: Counsel: Crown: Mr P Lowe Defence: Mr J Tyler-Stott
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate