NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Sparkes v Industrial Relations Secretary in respect of the Department of Communities and Justice (Corrective Services NSW) [2022] NSWIRComm 1021 Hearing dates: 10 and 11 November 2021, final submissions received 9 February 2022 Date of orders: 31 March 2022 Decision date: 31 March 2022 Jurisdiction: Industrial Relations Commission Before: Commissioner Sloan Decision: The Appeal is dismissed Catchwords: EMPLOYMENT AND INDUSTRIAL LAW – Public sector disciplinary appeal – Dismissal – employee in extra-marital relationship with subordinate employee – findings of guilt of common assault by the employee against co-worker – misconduct admitted – question of appropriate disciplinary action – whether assault to be mitigated by the context of the alleged sexual relationship between employee and co-worker – whether employee denied procedural fairness – relevance that misconduct occurred outside work and did not affect employee's work performance Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 s 61 Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007 s 13 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 s 9 Government Sector Employment Act 2013 ss 7, 69 Government Sector Employment (General) Rules 2014 rr 38, 40 Industrial Relations Act 1996 Ch 2 Pt 7, ss 100C, 164A Cases Cited: Dr A and Health District [2014] NSWIRComm 28 Eastwood v Industrial Relations Secretary on behalf of the Department of Communities and Justice (Corrective Services NSW) [2021] NSWIRComm 1014 Harry Day v John Smidmore and others (No. 2) [2005] NSWIRComm 406 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 Marroun v State Transit Authority [2017] NSWCA 273 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Nathan Sparkes (Appellant) Industrial Relations Secretary (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: V Bulut (Respondent) Solicitors: M Jaloussis, McNally Jones Staff Lawyers (Appellant) Clayton Utz (Respondent) File Number(s): 2021/161559 Publication restriction: Pursuant to s 164A of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 (NSW), the Commission orders that: 1. there be no disclosure of the name, address, picture or any other material that identifies, or may lead to the identification of, [name redacted], [name redacted]'s children, Mr Sparkes' children, or any current or former inmate held in the custody of Corrective Services NSW; and 2. the doing of any other thing that identifies, or may lead to the identification of, any such person is prohibited.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate