NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: JD & S Project Pty Limited v Katcorp Constructions Pty Limited [2021] NSWDC 772 Hearing dates: 30 April 2021 Date of orders: 30 April 2021 Decision date: 30 April 2021 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Neilson DCJ Decision: (1) I make the order in the schedule to the notice of motion filed; (2) The costs of the motion are reserved; and (3) I direct entry of the order forthwith. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Freezing orders sought by plaintiff over assets of the defendant. Whether plaintiff has "good arguable case". Whether plaintiff has discharged onus of establishing a danger that the judgment it seeks to record may be frustrated by actions of defendant in meantime disposing of assets. Moving of evidentiary onus to defendant. Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Cardile v LED Builders Pty Ltd (1999) 198 CLR 380 Curtis v NID Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 1072 Downer EDI Engineering v Taralga Wind Farm Nominees No.2 [2014] NSWSC 971 Fitz Jersey Pty Ltd v Atlas Construction Group Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 3) [2020] NSWSC 974 Frigo v Culhaci [1998] NSWCA 88 The Niedersachsen [1984] 1 All ER 398 Texts Cited: Nil. Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Applicant – JD & S Project Pty Limited Respondent – Katcorp Constructions Pty Limited Representation: Applicant Hughes, D. Respondent Chan, L. File Number(s): 2020/00200880 Publication restriction: Nil.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate