NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Loureiro v Mac Aus Unit Pty Ltd (No 4) [2022] NSWSC 370 Hearing dates: 23 March 2022 Date of orders: 31 March 2022 Decision date: 31 March 2022 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Gleeson J Decision: Grant leave to the plaintiffs to use the documents produced on subpoena (being the subpoena packets specified in [32] below), and the information contained therein, for the purpose of commencing and prosecuting proposed proceedings in the Equity Division against the second, third and fourth defendants and Sandra Conceicao. Catchwords: PROCEDURE – implied undertaking – use of documents produced on subpoena for purposes of fresh proceedings – whether special circumstances warrant release from undertaking – where no objection by or prejudice to documents' author – where some documents contain potentially sensitive information – where documents likely to achieve justice in fresh proceedings – where material could be obtained on subpoena in fresh proceedings Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 56 Conveyancing Act 1919 (Cth), s 37A Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 18.2(2)(b) Cases Cited: Harman v Secretary of State for Home Department (1983) 1 AC 280 Hearne v Street (2008) 235 CLR 125; [2008] HCA 36 James G Oberg (Sales) Pty Ltd v Oberg [2012] FCA 722; (2012) 292 ALR 673 Liberty Funding Pty Ltd v Phoenix Capital Ltd [2005] FCAFC 3; (2005) 218 ALR 283 Springfield Nominees Pty Ltd v Bridgelands Securities Ltd (1992) 38 FCR 217 Stokes v Toyne [2021] NSWSC 1049 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Carlos Jose Luis Loureiro (First plaintiff) Claudio Jose Leal Meireles (Second plaintiff) Jose Carlos Reis Meireles (Third plaintiff) Mac Aus Unit Pty Ltd (First defendant/respondent) Antonio Manuel De Carvalho Conceicao (Second defendant/respondent) Patricia Conceicao (Third defendant/respondent) David Conceicao (Fourth defendant/respondent) Sandra Conceicao (Fifth respondent) Representation: Counsel: E Bartley (Plaintiffs) M J Stevens (First to Fourth defendants/respondents) (24 March 2022)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate