NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Mao v Li [2022] NSWCATAP 101 Hearing dates: 22 March 2022, On the papers Date of orders: 5 April 2022 Decision date: 05 April 2022 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: The Hon D A Cowdroy AO QC, Principal Member R C Titterton OAM, Senior Member Decision: 1. A hearing be dispensed with. 2. The time for filing the Notice of Appeal is extended to 4 January 2022. 3. Leave to appeal refused. 4. Appeal otherwise dismissed. Catchwords: APPEALS – where leave required – no question of principle Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules 2014 (NSW) Cases Cited: Collins v Urban [2014] NSWCATAP 17 Pholi v Wearne [2014] NSWCATAP 78 Prendergast v Western Murray Irrigation Ltd [2014] NSWCATAP 69 Ryan v BKB Motor Vehicle Repairs Pty Ltd [2017] NSWCATAP 39 Texts Cited: None cited Category: Principal judgment Parties: Peter Gao (First Appellant) Kathy Gu (Second Appellant)
Dong Xia Li (First Respondent) David He (Second Respondent) Representation: First Appellant (self-represented) Second Appellant (self-represented)
First Respondent (self-represented) Second Respondent (self-represented) File Number(s): 2022/00002505 Publication restriction: N/A Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Citation: N/A Date of Decision: 20 November 2021 Before: J Levingston, General Member File Number(s): COM 21/41293
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate