NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Chalabian (No. 11) [2022] NSWSC 384 Hearing dates: 30 March 2022 Date of orders: 31 March 2022 Decision date: 05 April 2022 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: Johnson J Decision: The Court declines to give a warning under s.165 Evidence Act 1995 with respect to the evidence of Ashley Mills. Catchwords: CRIME – jury trial – defence application for Mahmood direction concerning certain persons not called by the Crown – ruling deferred until after closing addresses – defence application for warning under s.165 Evidence Act 1995 concerning evidence of Ashley Mills – consideration of relevant factors – application for s.165 warning declined Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Criminal Code (Cth) Cases Cited: Agius v R (2015) 252 A Crim R 538; [2015] NSWCCA 200 GAR v R (No. 2) [2010] NSWCCA 164 Kanaan and Ors v R [2006] NSWCCA 109 Mahmood v Western Australia (2008) 232 CLR 397; [2008] HCA 1 R v Baartman [2000] NSWCCA 298 R v Chalabian (No. 3) [2022] NSWSC 77 R v Chalabian (No. 8) [2022] NSWSC 304 R v Serratore (1999) 48 NSWLR 101; [1999] NSWCCA 377 R v Stewart (2001) 52 NSWLR 301; [2001] NSWCCA 260 Texts Cited: --- Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Regina (Crown) Sevag Chalabian (Accused) Representation: Counsel: Ms T McDonald SC; Ms G Wright SC (Crown) Mr GA Brady SC; Mr A Williams (Accused)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate