NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Wheatley v Salmon [2022] NSWSC 395 Hearing dates: 7-10 March 2022 Decision date: 05 April 2022 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Kunc J Decision: Estoppel not made out; Court will entertain application for possession if parties cannot agree when plaintiff should vacate property Catchwords: ESTOPPEL — Proprietary estoppel — Encouragement — Nature of promise — "I will buy you a house" — No issue of principle Cases Cited: BM Sydney Building Materials Pty Ltd v AWT Building Group (Aust) Pty Ltd [2019] NSWSC 421 Carter v Brine [2015] SASC 204 Cowper-Smith v Morgan 2017 SCC 61; [2017] 2 S.C.R. 754 Flinn v Flinn [1999] 3 VR 712 CA; [1999] VSCA 109 Hampson v Hampson [2010] NSWSC 217 Legione v Hateley (1983) 152 CLR 406; [1983] HCA 11 Priestley v Priestley [2017] NSWCA 155 Ramsden v Dyson (1866) L.R. 1 H.L. 129 Sidhu v Van Dyke (2014) 251 CLR 505; [2014] HCA 19 Sullivan v Sullivan & Ors [2006] NSWCA 312 Van Dyke v Sidhu [2012] NSWSC 118 Watson v Foxman & Ors; Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Foxman Holdings Pty Ltd (Receiver and Manager Appointed) (1995) 49 NSWLR 315 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Adele Wheatley (Plaintiff) Gregory Salmon (First Defendant) Danielle Anderson (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel:
A Crossland (Plaintiff) A Katsoulas (Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate