NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: RE v R [2022] NSWCCA 73 Hearing dates: 30 March 2022 Date of orders: 30 March 2022 Decision date: 11 April 2022 Before: Macfarlan JA at [1]; Bellew J at [14]; Wright J at [15] Decision: Orders made on 30 March 2022: (1) Extend the time for leave to appeal to today. (2) Allow the appeal. (3) Quash the applicant's convictions and sentence. (4) Remit the matter to the District Court for a retrial. (5) List the matter in the District Court on the next arraignment date occurring 7 days after today's date. (6) Reasons for judgment reserved. Catchwords: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE – fitness to be tried – trial judge found no real and substantial concern about the applicant's fitness to stand trial – whether evidence tendered on appeal indicated that there was a miscarriage of justice because there exists an unresolved question about the applicant's then fitness to be tried Legislation Cited: Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1990 (NSW), s 10 Cases Cited: Eastman v The Queen (2000) 203 CLR 1; [2000] HCA 29 Hofer v R [2019] NSWCCA 244 JM v R; R v JM [2017] NSWCCA 138 R v Mailes (2001) 53 NSWLR 251; [2001] NSWCCA 155 R v Tier [2001] NSWCCA 53; 121 A Crim R 509 Category: Principal judgment Parties: RE (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: G Bashir SC / A Cook (Applicant) G Newton (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate