NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Environment Protection Authority v ACE Demolition & Excavation Pty Ltd; Allam [2022] NSWLEC 45 Hearing dates: 4, 5, 24 and 25 August, 27 and 28 September 2021 Date of orders: 10 May 2022 Decision date: 10 May 2022 Jurisdiction: Class 5 Before: Moore J Decision: See directions at [142] and [143] Catchwords: EVIDENCE - Prosecutor serves Defendants with text or WhatsApp conversations obtained from the mobile phone of Mr Sami Allam - messages grouped in seventeen categories of message conversations - Prosecutor identifies the matter for which each group of message conversations is said to demonstrate - some message conversations proposed to be relied upon in more than one category identified by the Prosecutor - some messages proposed to be relied upon by the Prosecutor for hearsay purposes - advance rulings sought by the Defendants pursuant to s 192A of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) concerning admissibility of the text messages and WhatsApp conversations - if admissible, Defendants seek restrictions on the use of the messages - agreement between Prosecutor and Defendants on the terms of Consent Orders concerning the majority of the categories identified by the Prosecutor - Consent Orders made concerning the agreed categories - agreement between the Prosecutor and the Defendants concerning proposed hearsay uses - Consent Orders made concerning proposed hearsay uses - admissibility rulings made concerning text and/or WhatsApp message proposed to be relied upon in disputed categories Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995, s 192A Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 Cases Cited: Adam v The Queen (2001) 207 CLR 96; [2001] HCA 57 Environment Protection Authority v Allam [2021] NSWLEC 103 Environment Protection Authority v Allam (No 2) [2022] NSWLEC 7 Environment Protection Authority v ACE Demolition & Excavation Pty Ltd [2022] NSWLEC 44 Meridian Global Funds Management Asia Ltd v Securities Commission [1995] 2 AC 500 Papakosmas v The Queen (1999) 196 CLR 297; [1999] HCA 37 R v Shamouil (2006) 66 NSWLR 228; [2006] NSWCCA 112 Tesco Supermarkets Ltd v Nattrass [1972] AC 153 Tiger Nominees Pty Ltd v State Pollution Control Commission (1992) 25 NSWLR 715 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Environment Protection Authority (Prosecutor and Respondent on the motion) ACE Demolition & Excavation Pty Ltd (First Defendant and First Applicant on the motion) Sami Allam (Second Defendant and Second Applicant on the motion) Representation: Counsel: Mr D Buchanan SC/Ms F Graham, barrister (Prosecutor and Respondent on the motion) Mr J Potts SC/Ms K Morris, barrister (Defendants and Applicants on the motion)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate