NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Azizi v Council of the City of Ryde; Alnox Pty Ltd v Council of the City of Ryde (No 3) [2022] NSWLEC 37 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 21 April 2022 Decision date: 21 April 2022 Jurisdiction: Class 3 Before: Moore J Decision: See orders at [33] Catchwords: COSTS - compulsory acquisition of land - land acquired by Council to add to public open space - Valuer General determines compensation on hypothetical development potential as medium density housing - dispossessed owners contend for higher valuation based on high density residential potential - Council contends for lower valuation based on existing low density residential zoning - held Valuer General's determination too high but not to the extent sought by Council - less intense medium density development appropriate development potential - claim for stamp duty equivalent compensation - claim rejected - Council contends for less than maximum compensation for Disadvantage resulting from relocation - maximum statutory compensation for Disadvantage resulting from relocation awarded - mixed overall outcome of the proceedings - no unreasonable conduct by dispossessed owners - overall result for dispossessed owners significantly better than that proposed by the Council - Council to pay Applicants' costs of the proceedings COSTS - costs of costs proceedings follow the event - Council to pay Applicants' costs of costs proceedings Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005, s 98 Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, r 42.1 Cases Cited: Azizi v Council of the City of Ryde; Alnox Pty Limited v Council of the City of Ryde (No 2) [2022] NSWLEC 3 Banno v Commonwealth of Australia (1993) 45 FCR 32 Brock v Roads and Maritime Services (formerly Roads and Traffic Authority of NSW) (2012) 191 LGERA 267; [2012] NSWCA 404 Dillon v Gosford City Council (2011) 184 LGERA 179; [2011] NSWCA 328 James v Surf Road Nominees Pty Ltd (No 2) [2005] NSWCA 296 Latoudis v Casey (1990) 170 CLR 534; [1990] HCA 59 Qasabian Family Investments Pty Ltd v Roads and Maritime Services (No 2); Fishing Station Pty Ltd v Roads and Maritime Services (No 2) [2017] NSWLEC 179 Roads and Traffic Authority v McGregor & Anor (No 2) [2005] NSWCA 453 Sze Tu v Lowe (No 2) [2015] NSWCA 91 Category: Costs Parties: Matter No 168439 of 2020 Raymond Boutros Azizi (Applicant) Council of the City of Ryde (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate