NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Batak [2022] NSWSC 424 Hearing dates: 31 March 2022 Date of orders: 5 April 2022 Decision date: 20 April 2022 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: R A Hulme J Decision: Motion to quash the indictment or to permanently stay proceedings on the count of murder is refused. Catchwords: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE — Stay of proceedings — Permanent — motion to permanently stay proceedings refused — motion to quash indictment refused Legislation Cited: Crimes Act (1900) NSW, ss 97(2), 111(3) Cases Cited: Dickson v R [2017] NSWCCA 78 Hargraves v The Queen; Stoten v The Queen [2011] HCA 44; 245 CLR 257 IL v R [2016] NSWCCA 51 IL v The Queen (2017) 262 CLR 268; [2017] HCA 27 Martinez v R; Tortell v R [2019] NSWCCA 153 Osland v The Queen (1998) 197 CLR 316; [1998] HCA 75 Qaumi, Farhad v R; Qaumi, Mumtaz v R; Qaumi, Jamil v R [2020] NSWCCA 163 R v Batcheldor v R; Walsh v R [2014] NSWCCA 252 R v Clough (1992) 28 NSWLR 396 at 400 R v Lew [2003] NSWSC 1073 R v Sharah (1992) 30 NSWLR 292 R v Stokes; R v Difford (1990) 51 A Crim R 25 at 35-37 R v Tangye (1997) 92 A Crim R 545 R v Tietie (1988) 34 A Crim R 438 at 445-447 Tierney v R [2016] NSWCCA 144 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Regina Cem Batak Representation: Counsel: Ms S Traynor (Crown) Mr T Hughes (Accused)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate